<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tactical response to infringers &#8211; copy them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/300/tactical-response-to-infringers-copy-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/300/tactical-response-to-infringers-copy-them/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/300/tactical-response-to-infringers-copy-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=300#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Michelle - I think you&#039;re right.&#160; Companies that encourage others to innovate and add to their IP (eg. under licence) can do incredibly well.&#160; This model is very common and successful in the online environment - developers are usually handed tools to use to develop their own improvements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not so common outside the online world, and the trouble for Mattel has arisen in trying to apply the old model where it perhaps doesn&#039;t fit so well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michelle &#8211; I think you&#8217;re right.&nbsp; Companies that encourage others to innovate and add to their IP (eg. under licence) can do incredibly well.&nbsp; This model is very common and successful in the online environment &#8211; developers are usually handed tools to use to develop their own improvements.</p>
<p>Not so common outside the online world, and the trouble for Mattel has arisen in trying to apply the old model where it perhaps doesn&#8217;t fit so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/300/tactical-response-to-infringers-copy-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=300#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a fascinating story.&#160; Apparently sales of the &#039;official&#039; board game have increased on the back of Scrabulous taking&#160;the game to a new audience.&#160; Surely a deal is a best way solution not launching an inferior product. Maybe a case of being blinded by &#039;not invented here&#039;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a fascinating story.&nbsp; Apparently sales of the &#8216;official&#8217; board game have increased on the back of Scrabulous taking&nbsp;the game to a new audience.&nbsp; Surely a deal is a best way solution not launching an inferior product. Maybe a case of being blinded by &#8216;not invented here&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

