<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US provisional patents &amp; patent strategy &#8211; why wouldn&#039;t you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=322#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks Kyle&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=322#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with all these comments--Joyce in particular.&#160; When I was in house at an appliance designer/MFG, a provisional was good in an emergency, but otherwise it simply delayed the &quot;real&quot; patent and added to the cost.&#160; Product life cycle was short (and patent process already to long) to bother with a provisional.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all these comments&#8211;Joyce in particular.&nbsp; When I was in house at an appliance designer/MFG, a provisional was good in an emergency, but otherwise it simply delayed the &#8220;real&#8221; patent and added to the cost.&nbsp; Product life cycle was short (and patent process already to long) to bother with a provisional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=322#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it may have something to do with publication of the provisional, even if a corresponding full application is never filed...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it may have something to do with publication of the provisional, even if a corresponding full application is never filed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/322/us-provisional-patents-and-patent-strategy-why-wouldnt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=322#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Michael&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only way to get the extra twelve months of priority under 35 USC 102(b) - before your first filing date - is to file a US application of some description, or a PCT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A US provisional gives you two years of prior&#160; art to ignore before you file the PCT application.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Duncan&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael</p>
<p>The only way to get the extra twelve months of priority under 35 USC 102(b) &#8211; before your first filing date &#8211; is to file a US application of some description, or a PCT.</p>
<p>A US provisional gives you two years of prior&nbsp; art to ignore before you file the PCT application.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Duncan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

