<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Sharks (Trolls?) &#8211; insightful or missing the point?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Search</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=330#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>It is imperative for someone who seeks patent protection to understand the scope of the invention to be patented, whether it is new or known, whether it has some economical benefit in comparison to the available arts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is imperative for someone who seeks patent protection to understand the scope of the invention to be patented, whether it is new or known, whether it has some economical benefit in comparison to the available arts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leighton</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Leighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=330#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would be the first to admit that no search is comprehensive, but no two patent searches are the same and, to use the old adage, you get what you pay for.&#160; So if you are serious about defending yourselves against patent trolls you can find these patents, you just need to look hard to find the right searcher who knows the subject area very well indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be the first to admit that no search is comprehensive, but no two patent searches are the same and, to use the old adage, you get what you pay for.&nbsp; So if you are serious about defending yourselves against patent trolls you can find these patents, you just need to look hard to find the right searcher who knows the subject area very well indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=330#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brent - thanks very much, and welcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent &#8211; thanks very much, and welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/330/patent-sharks-trolls-insightful-or-missing-the-point/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=330#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great comments, Duncan. I posted somewhat similar responses to the patent shark recommendations (although not nearly as concisely as you) on my blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://brentblog.typepad.com/brentblog/2008/06/trolls-attack-i.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. My perspective was from someone in R&amp;D and heads my company&#039;s patent strategy. Really, the article was not well suited for HBR. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, Duncan. I posted somewhat similar responses to the patent shark recommendations (although not nearly as concisely as you) on my blog <a href="http://brentblog.typepad.com/brentblog/2008/06/trolls-attack-i.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. My perspective was from someone in R&amp;D and heads my company&#8217;s patent strategy. Really, the article was not well suited for HBR. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

