<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 3 things leaders need to know about IP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=346#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks McVooty - though I wouldn&#039;t advise the leaders to try and understand in any depth what is protectable.&#160; They usually think too narrowly and this leads to a lack of creativity - they decide before getting expert input and kill potentially very useful ideas / strategic moves.&#160; Better to have them asking &#039;why not?&#039; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Apologies that it took a while for your comment to come through, there&#039;s a second button to click when you make a comment.&#160; If you miss it, then it sits in the background until I get a chance to review and let it through.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks McVooty &#8211; though I wouldn&#8217;t advise the leaders to try and understand in any depth what is protectable.&nbsp; They usually think too narrowly and this leads to a lack of creativity &#8211; they decide before getting expert input and kill potentially very useful ideas / strategic moves.&nbsp; Better to have them asking &#8216;why not?&#8217; </p>
<p>(Apologies that it took a while for your comment to come through, there&#8217;s a second button to click when you make a comment.&nbsp; If you miss it, then it sits in the background until I get a chance to review and let it through.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=346#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Allan - for the record, I don&#039;t agree with your distinction between tactics and strategy, but I still like the point you&#039;re making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks Canuckinoz for your thoughts on trade marks and little guys.&#160; Trade mark strategy for little guys is an interesting one - see the guest post by Allan that I just put up&#160;&#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We only have a few small clients, but from working with them, I think there&#039;s always a risk of wasting time and money on branding at a stage that is way too early.&#160; &lt;br /&gt;(I&#039;m advocating focus and judicial deployment of resources.&#160; I&#039;m not saying that they should ignore branding.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Allan &#8211; for the record, I don&#8217;t agree with your distinction between tactics and strategy, but I still like the point you&#8217;re making.</p>
<p>Thanks Canuckinoz for your thoughts on trade marks and little guys.&nbsp; Trade mark strategy for little guys is an interesting one &#8211; see the guest post by Allan that I just put up&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>We only have a few small clients, but from working with them, I think there&#8217;s always a risk of wasting time and money on branding at a stage that is way too early.&nbsp; <br />(I&#8217;m advocating focus and judicial deployment of resources.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not saying that they should ignore branding.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan J Main</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan J Main</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=346#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Apologies for arriving late at this posting, but Jackie&#039;s comments on IP Culture are so timeless, that my delay is immaterial, and are so &quot;on point&quot; that I can&#039;t allow the passage of time to&#160;excuse myself from speaking out in endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jackie, I almost wept with joy when I read your comments on the necessity of organisational&#160;IP culture for successful implementation of IP strategy!&#160; Personally I go even further because I believe that there is no such thing as IP strategy, merely IP tactics to bring effect to Corporate Strategy (capitalised advisedly).&#160; HOWEVER there is &quot;IP Culture&quot;,&#160;and an organisation that aims to live by innovation (and without it every business dies) will focus hard on developing their IP Culture at every level of the organisation.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my former life as IP Manager for NZ&#039;s largest company I made cultivating an organisation-wide IP culture one of my top-3 responsibilities.&#160; While&#160;that was cultivated most intensively&#160;with the R&amp;D and technology commercialisation operations it permeated throughout the organisation to the extent that we built an &quot;IP101&quot; block into the corporate induction programme.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These days I am endeavouring to make Corporate IP Culture development&#160;a primary aspect of my consulting business, as should be evident from my home page.&#160; You cannot imagine how reinforcing it was to&#160;have that ambition endorsed by such a wise sage as yourself!&#160; Thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for arriving late at this posting, but Jackie&#8217;s comments on IP Culture are so timeless, that my delay is immaterial, and are so &#8220;on point&#8221; that I can&#8217;t allow the passage of time to&nbsp;excuse myself from speaking out in endorsement.</p>
<p>Jackie, I almost wept with joy when I read your comments on the necessity of organisational&nbsp;IP culture for successful implementation of IP strategy!&nbsp; Personally I go even further because I believe that there is no such thing as IP strategy, merely IP tactics to bring effect to Corporate Strategy (capitalised advisedly).&nbsp; HOWEVER there is &#8220;IP Culture&#8221;,&nbsp;and an organisation that aims to live by innovation (and without it every business dies) will focus hard on developing their IP Culture at every level of the organisation.&nbsp; </p>
<p>In my former life as IP Manager for NZ&#8217;s largest company I made cultivating an organisation-wide IP culture one of my top-3 responsibilities.&nbsp; While&nbsp;that was cultivated most intensively&nbsp;with the R&amp;D and technology commercialisation operations it permeated throughout the organisation to the extent that we built an &#8220;IP101&#8243; block into the corporate induction programme.&nbsp; </p>
<p>These days I am endeavouring to make Corporate IP Culture development&nbsp;a primary aspect of my consulting business, as should be evident from my home page.&nbsp; You cannot imagine how reinforcing it was to&nbsp;have that ambition endorsed by such a wise sage as yourself!&nbsp; Thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcvooty</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/346/top-3-things-leaders-need-to-know-about-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>mcvooty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=346#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Using IP strategically also means:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Understanding what is and isn&#039;t protectable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Focusing R&amp;D on IP that provides a reasonable ROI.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using IP strategically also means:</p>
<p>1. Understanding what is and isn&#8217;t protectable.</p>
<p>2. Focusing R&amp;D on IP that provides a reasonable ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

