<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organisational culture and IP strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/348/organisational-culture-and-ip-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/348/organisational-culture-and-ip-strategy/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/348/organisational-culture-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=348#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great, Allan, thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, Allan, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Main</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/348/organisational-culture-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Main</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=348#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello again Duncan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you know I am passionate about the role of an organisational IP culture in fulfilling corporate promise with its IP.&#160; Helping my clients achieve this is a leading platform of my consulting business.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IP Culture is the human component of an effectively performing IP Organisation, the (equally important)&#160;structural aspect is IP Architecture (policies, procedures, organisational structure etc).&#160; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you rightly point out the key thing with an IP culture is corporate uniformity of belief and adherence.&#160; I like to describe that in two dimensions - CONSISTENCY which is uniformity throughout and across all organisational levels, and CONSTANCY which is uniformity across the time dimension.&#160; IP Culture is not unique in that requirement, it is a requisite to developing any aspect of high performing organisational culture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And like any aspect of culture it needs to be led, which implies leadership, which implies leaders, which implies top down.&#160; HOWEVER, while top-down is &lt;u&gt;necessary&lt;/u&gt; (ie don&#039;t even start if the CEO and Board are cynical), it is &lt;u&gt;not sufficient&lt;/u&gt;.&#160; Ultimately the success of&#160;IP Culture implementation&#160;will be determined by bottom-up performance.&#160; The day-to-day practical&#160;activities of the lower half of the corporate strata will have substantially greater impact on business IP performance than will the day-to-day&#160;work of the upper echelons.&#160; But if the highest levels of the organisation walk out of step with the drum they beat, you can forget delivering a culture where all personnel make their day to day choices in ways that provide a solid platform of IP value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So in short, to answer your question, in my view IP Culture is LED top down but LIVED bottom-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AJM&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again Duncan.</p>
<p>As you know I am passionate about the role of an organisational IP culture in fulfilling corporate promise with its IP.&nbsp; Helping my clients achieve this is a leading platform of my consulting business.&nbsp; </p>
<p>IP Culture is the human component of an effectively performing IP Organisation, the (equally important)&nbsp;structural aspect is IP Architecture (policies, procedures, organisational structure etc).&nbsp; </p>
<p>As you rightly point out the key thing with an IP culture is corporate uniformity of belief and adherence.&nbsp; I like to describe that in two dimensions &#8211; CONSISTENCY which is uniformity throughout and across all organisational levels, and CONSTANCY which is uniformity across the time dimension.&nbsp; IP Culture is not unique in that requirement, it is a requisite to developing any aspect of high performing organisational culture.</p>
<p>And like any aspect of culture it needs to be led, which implies leadership, which implies leaders, which implies top down.&nbsp; HOWEVER, while top-down is <u>necessary</u> (ie don&#8217;t even start if the CEO and Board are cynical), it is <u>not sufficient</u>.&nbsp; Ultimately the success of&nbsp;IP Culture implementation&nbsp;will be determined by bottom-up performance.&nbsp; The day-to-day practical&nbsp;activities of the lower half of the corporate strata will have substantially greater impact on business IP performance than will the day-to-day&nbsp;work of the upper echelons.&nbsp; But if the highest levels of the organisation walk out of step with the drum they beat, you can forget delivering a culture where all personnel make their day to day choices in ways that provide a solid platform of IP value.</p>
<p>So in short, to answer your question, in my view IP Culture is LED top down but LIVED bottom-up.</p>
<p>AJM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

