<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Employee motivation and IP strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/349/employee-motivation-and-ip-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/349/employee-motivation-and-ip-strategy/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/349/employee-motivation-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=349#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks canuckinoz - great comments.&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve heard many HR experts say that remuneration per se is more of a demotivator than a motivator.&#160; As soon as money is involved, people start comparing and inevitably someone is unhappy.&lt;br /&gt;If you&#039;re paying your inventing team well to start with, then perhaps further direct financial rewards aren&#039;t necessary.&#160; &lt;br /&gt;I think this is an area where some creativity and perhaps some targetted thinking will pay off more than just more money.&#160; So, you might find that a weekend away, a set of golf clubs, a car parking space at the office, etc., etc. may work just as well, or even better.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks canuckinoz &#8211; great comments.<br />I&#8217;ve heard many HR experts say that remuneration per se is more of a demotivator than a motivator.&nbsp; As soon as money is involved, people start comparing and inevitably someone is unhappy.<br />If you&#8217;re paying your inventing team well to start with, then perhaps further direct financial rewards aren&#8217;t necessary.&nbsp; <br />I think this is an area where some creativity and perhaps some targetted thinking will pay off more than just more money.&nbsp; So, you might find that a weekend away, a set of golf clubs, a car parking space at the office, etc., etc. may work just as well, or even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canuckinoz</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/349/employee-motivation-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>canuckinoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=349#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The &quot;reward&quot; must include some sort of remuneration.&#160; Otherwise, employees will not be motivated to assist in the creation of IP, particularly patents.&#160; As you know even understanding what is a patentable invention is often difficult for your average inventive employee. And patent drafting requires particular legal expertise, which by its nature, is not usually part of an inventor&#039;s skill set.&#160; To ask most inventors who are scientists and engineers even to work with a good drafter, in addition to their regular duties, requires a strong incentive, generally of some monetary value.&#160; Of course, companies with international operations, particularly in Germany, will be aware of the right of employee inventors to share the &quot;spoils&quot; of their valuable inventions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really key is a reward system that is fair but is aligned with the long time it takes for a patent to be granted.&#160; Many inventors are no longer around when a patent application comes under examination, particularly in Japan.&#160; Everyone in this game knows that it is usually a long journey before an invention becomes valuable IP and the reward system should reflect the stages of value creation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;reward&#8221; must include some sort of remuneration.&nbsp; Otherwise, employees will not be motivated to assist in the creation of IP, particularly patents.&nbsp; As you know even understanding what is a patentable invention is often difficult for your average inventive employee. And patent drafting requires particular legal expertise, which by its nature, is not usually part of an inventor&#8217;s skill set.&nbsp; To ask most inventors who are scientists and engineers even to work with a good drafter, in addition to their regular duties, requires a strong incentive, generally of some monetary value.&nbsp; Of course, companies with international operations, particularly in Germany, will be aware of the right of employee inventors to share the &#8220;spoils&#8221; of their valuable inventions.</p>
<p>Really key is a reward system that is fair but is aligned with the long time it takes for a patent to be granted.&nbsp; Many inventors are no longer around when a patent application comes under examination, particularly in Japan.&nbsp; Everyone in this game knows that it is usually a long journey before an invention becomes valuable IP and the reward system should reflect the stages of value creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

