<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Think Tank Global Week in Review Online Edition &#8211; Friday, 10 October 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/400/ip-think-tank-global-week-in-review-online-edition-friday-10-october-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/400/ip-think-tank-global-week-in-review-online-edition-friday-10-october-2008/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald J Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/400/ip-think-tank-global-week-in-review-online-edition-friday-10-october-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald J Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=400#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ronald J Riley v. Dozier&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To more fully understand this case see:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dozier Internet Law threatens InventorEd and others on behalf of its invention promotion client Inventor-Link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.InventorEd.org/caution/inventor-link/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a response to these threats the following site was created:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://www.CyberTrialLawyer-SUCKS.com &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Public Citizen steps in to address SLAPP:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2008/10/another-case-of.html &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ronald J. Riley,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking only on my own behalf.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Affiliations:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senior Fellow - www.patentPolicy.org &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;President - Alliance for American Innovation Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Washington, DC &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald J Riley v. Dozier</p>
<p>To more fully understand this case see:</p>
<p>Dozier Internet Law threatens InventorEd and others on behalf of its invention promotion client Inventor-Link.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.InventorEd.org/caution/inventor-link/" rel="nofollow">http://www.InventorEd.org/caution/inventor-link/</a></p>
<p>As a response to these threats the following site was created:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.CyberTrialLawyer-SUCKS.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.CyberTrialLawyer-SUCKS.com</a> </p>
<p>Public Citizen steps in to address SLAPP:</p>
<p><a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2008/10/another-case-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2008/10/another-case-of.html</a> </p>
<p>Ronald J. Riley,</p>
<p>Speaking only on my own behalf.</p>
<p>Affiliations:</p>
<p>President &#8211; <a href="http://www.PIAUSA.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.PIAUSA.org</a> &#8211; RJR at PIAUSA.org </p>
<p>Executive Director &#8211; <a href="http://www.InventorEd.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.InventorEd.org</a> &#8211; RJR at InvEd.org </p>
<p>Senior Fellow &#8211; <a href="http://www.patentPolicy.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentPolicy.org</a> </p>
<p>President &#8211; Alliance for American Innovation Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel </p>
<p>Washington, DC </p>
<p>Direct (202) 318-1595 &#8211; 9 am to 9 pm EST. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

