Comments on: Certainty or fairness – what would you choose? http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/491/certainty-or-fairness-what-would-you-choose/ Trusted advisors to the world's most innovative companies Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Duncan http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/491/certainty-or-fairness-what-would-you-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1385 Duncan Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:21:58 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=491#comment-1385 <p>Thanks Mukundan</p> Thanks Mukundan

]]> By: Mukundan R http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/491/certainty-or-fairness-what-would-you-choose/comment-page-1/#comment-1384 Mukundan R Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:20:09 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=491#comment-1384 <p>Hi,</p><p>A very valid and most relevant fundamental question. </p><p>To my understanding:<br />what is "certain" to be done is dependent on "fairness". This raises the issue of having a uniform IP system?  Does the use of "fairness" method reciprocate the theory of evolution (fittest being survives)?</p><p>The use of case laws is an attempt to codify the IP law, which itself is questionable as the innovation is per se and cannot be compared across past developments. </p> Hi,

A very valid and most relevant fundamental question.

To my understanding:
what is “certain” to be done is dependent on “fairness”. This raises the issue of having a uniform IP system?  Does the use of “fairness” method reciprocate the theory of evolution (fittest being survives)?

The use of case laws is an attempt to codify the IP law, which itself is questionable as the innovation is per se and cannot be compared across past developments.

]]>