Comments on: Pharmaceutical manufacture for export – what do you think? http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/540/pharmaceutical-manufacture-for-export-what-do-you-think/ Trusted advisors to the world's most innovative companies Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Duncan http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/540/pharmaceutical-manufacture-for-export-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-1397 Duncan Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:59:09 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=540#comment-1397 <p>Hey Stan<br />Thanks for your thoughts.  The limited exception doesn't and wouldn't apply to parallel imports which would be an infringement.  So, although it might be more likely in a country, it is still patent infringement, and therefore perhaps not meaningless?</p> Hey Stan
Thanks for your thoughts.  The limited exception doesn’t and wouldn’t apply to parallel imports which would be an infringement.  So, although it might be more likely in a country, it is still patent infringement, and therefore perhaps not meaningless?

]]> By: Duncan http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/540/pharmaceutical-manufacture-for-export-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-2068 Duncan Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:59:00 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=540#comment-2068 Hey StanThanks for your thoughts.  The limited exception doesn't and wouldn't apply to parallel imports which would be an infringement.  So, although it might be more likely in a country, it is still patent infringement, and therefore perhaps not meaningless? Hey StanThanks for your thoughts.  The limited exception doesn’t and wouldn’t apply to parallel imports which would be an infringement.  So, although it might be more likely in a country, it is still patent infringement, and therefore perhaps not meaningless?

]]> By: Stan Abrams http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/540/pharmaceutical-manufacture-for-export-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-1396 Stan Abrams Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:56:46 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=540#comment-1396 <p> Duncan,</p><p> Interesting issue. Just wondered how parallel imports might fit into the picture. If you manufacture for export only, one would assume that re-importation is not possible. For some countries, this is something likely to happen, though. To the extent that this is likely in a country, this would tend to make the exportation distinction meaningless.</p><p> --Stan</p> Duncan,

Interesting issue. Just wondered how parallel imports might fit into the
picture. If you manufacture for export only, one would assume that
re-importation is not possible. For some countries, this is something likely to
happen, though. To the extent that this is likely in a country, this would tend
to make the exportation distinction meaningless.

–Stan

]]> By: Stan Abrams http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/540/pharmaceutical-manufacture-for-export-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-2067 Stan Abrams Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:56:00 +0000 http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=540#comment-2067 Duncan, Interesting issue. Just wondered how parallel imports might fit into the picture. If you manufacture for export only, one would assume that re-importation is not possible. For some countries, this is something likely to happen, though. To the extent that this is likely in a country, this would tend to make the exportation distinction meaningless. --Stan Duncan,
Interesting issue. Just wondered how parallel imports might fit into the
picture. If you manufacture for export only, one would assume that
re-importation is not possible. For some countries, this is something likely to
happen, though. To the extent that this is likely in a country, this would tend
to make the exportation distinction meaningless.
–Stan

]]>