<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The long tail and IP Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/780/the-long-tail-and-ip-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/780/the-long-tail-and-ip-strategy/</link>
	<description>Trusted advisors to the world&#039;s most innovative companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gale</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/780/the-long-tail-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=780#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s little&#160;point&#160;in having&#160;a patent strategy when the likes of Microsoft will trample on your IPR&#160;and refuse to settle this side of an expensive court case. In our own case, despite the best efforts of&#160;a number of&#160;concerned Microsoft employees, Microsoft NDAs&#160;have been proven to be&#160;utterly worthless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DoJ has a track record of failing&#160;to&#160;reign-in the excesses of US corporations, seeing illegal acquisition of IP&#160;as an intrinsic part of US Foreign Policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the back of the TADAG.com experience, SITFO.org has had to advise all of its customers not to engage with US corporations on matters relating to IPR.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s little&nbsp;point&nbsp;in having&nbsp;a patent strategy when the likes of Microsoft will trample on your IPR&nbsp;and refuse to settle this side of an expensive court case. In our own case, despite the best efforts of&nbsp;a number of&nbsp;concerned Microsoft employees, Microsoft NDAs&nbsp;have been proven to be&nbsp;utterly worthless.</p>
<p>The DoJ has a track record of failing&nbsp;to&nbsp;reign-in the excesses of US corporations, seeing illegal acquisition of IP&nbsp;as an intrinsic part of US Foreign Policy.</p>
<p>On the back of the TADAG.com experience, SITFO.org has had to advise all of its customers not to engage with US corporations on matters relating to IPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gena777</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/780/the-long-tail-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Gena777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=780#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I personally believe that more companies should follow Google&#039;s lead and consider implementing a design patent strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally believe that more companies should follow Google&#8217;s lead and consider implementing a design patent strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry L.</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkipstrategy.com/ipthinktank/780/the-long-tail-and-ip-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:100/thinkipstrategy/?p=780#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. Many IP departments are struggling to find better ways to monetize their intellectual property assets. As you pointed out, a better application of Pareto principle and Long tail theory across their portfolio can help them identify &quot;core&quot; assets versus &quot;long tail&quot; assets.&#160; These &#039;long tail&#039; assets can then be pooled together in &#039;lots&#039; or &#039;give-away&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A better management of these assets is the starting point for any such initiatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerry L., Lecorpio&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Many IP departments are struggling to find better ways to monetize their intellectual property assets. As you pointed out, a better application of Pareto principle and Long tail theory across their portfolio can help them identify &quot;core&quot; assets versus &quot;long tail&quot; assets.&nbsp; These &#8216;long tail&#8217; assets can then be pooled together in &#8216;lots&#8217; or &#8216;give-away&#8217;.</p>
<p>A better management of these assets is the starting point for any such initiatives.</p>
<p>Jerry L., Lecorpio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

